SMP Overwhelmingly Opposed
Last night, at the Grove
Community Center, the
second of five public meetings was hosted by the GRDA to gather addition public
input on the current draft of the shoreline management plan. I would estimate
approximately 250 people were in attendance. The majority of them expressed
views opposing the plan. The logistics and management of this meeting were far
superior to the first gathering last week at Cleora
Middle School.
Unlike the first
meeting, GRDA CEO Kevin Easley was
in attendance. His opening remarks were aimed at assuring those in attendance
the existing draft was just that and would remain a work in progress and
the public’s opinion would go a long way in determining the final version
of the plan.
As with the first
meeting, support for the plan as it exists today was all but non existent.
Predictably, Mike Brady, the president of the Duck Creek Property Owners
Association, a sitting member of all three stakeholder working group committees
and long-time critic of the authority was one of only two speakers in support
of the plan. He had softened his approach of bashing the authority and
commercial operators on the lake as the driving force behind the need for such
a plan. But he didn’t miss the opportunity to perhaps offend the majority of
those in attendance by accusing most of being ignorant when it came to the
plans contents. In the first two meetings he has predictably criticized the
authority, described the federal Energy Regulatory Commission as spineless and
expressed his total dissatisfaction with the consulting firm, Kleinschmidt
& Associates, hired to author the SMP. A sane person could only draw the
conclusion that in Mike Brady’s mind he is the only one capable of effectively
managing grand Lake and charting its future.
I followed Brady to
the microphone and quickly covered our previously recommended changes to the
plan which included fewer zones, a two tier vegetation management plan, and a
different approach to determining the sensitive land classification and an
appeal process for adjacent property owners if they were adversely affected by
the plan. I followed that with my calling for a show of hands of those in attendance
who supported the plan. There were two, Brady and Don Read. I then asked for a
show of hands of those opposing the plan and the response was overwhelmingly in
opposition of the plan. The mediator had it so noted in the official record.
I also spent time
challenging the make up of the so called stakeholder working group committees
and how the remaining twenty or so participants were in no way representative
of the majority of Grand Lakers. I also informed the audience of something Mike
Brady and his fellow committee members have never seemed to accept or
understand; they are advisory in nature and have no authority. This twenty group, controlled by the Brady influence, has
made no secret of their plans to file a majority opinion with FERC if the GRDA
strays from their recommendations. I informed those in attendance we were the
majority and we would act accordingly.
We need to stay
committed to our course of displaying this plan is not embraced by the silent
majority of Grand Lakers. We need to remain strong in our opposition to this
plan throughout the remaining three meetings. The next one is next Wednesday in
Tulsa at Union
High School. It’s very
important for our Tulsa Grand Lakers to make a strong showing at this meeting.
We can get this plan changed if the remaining meetings go as the first two.
Let’s not miss the opportunity for a common sense approach to prevail.
See ya’ in Tulsa!